Proof, Not Promises
Every number below comes from automated E2E tests against live AI providers. No cherry-picking, no mock data.
Across 3 scenarios: 32 (todo) + 82 (e-commerce) + 100 (iterate). 4 categories: basic, edge, integration, security.
Simple apps score A (90/100). Complex apps score B-C. Graded on completeness, security, compatibility, code quality, test coverage.
Test Agent output reduced from 11,431 → 2,763 tokens. Review Agent: 4,274 → 1,785. System prompts: -40%. Total: 35-45% savings.
From ICLR, NeurIPS, ACL, EMNLP, FSE, NAACL, ICML, ACM TOSEM. Every design decision has a citation. Not a weekend hack.
Why Co-Lab
Traditional development chains hand-offs across silos. Requirements drift, code reviews stall, and more time is spent coordinating than building.
Every step waits on the last
Docs, Slack, Jira, repeat
3–6 week average cycle
Research-Driven Features
Every architectural decision has a citation. A system designed using peer-reviewed advances in multi-agent AI research.
Frontend and Backend agents run simultaneously, sharing an API contract for compatible endpoints and response shapes.
The Orchestrator writes a formal contract before any code is generated. Both agents implement the same spec.
Every generation is scored across 5 dimensions: completeness, security, compatibility, code quality, and test coverage.
The Test Agent generates tests against the specification, not the code. Tests check what SHOULD work, not what DOES.
When quality is low, the system identifies specific issues, classifies which agent should fix them, and runs targeted repairs.
You review the plan before code is generated. Two confirmation gates prevent wasted computation.
Mix and match: GPT for frontend, Claude for backend, Gemini for review. Each agent can use a different model.
Preview generated apps live via WebContainer — no setup, no install, no leaving the browser.